Income Is Not Wealth: The Difference Nobody Explained

Hello Friends,

Happy Monday. Two weeks into our August theme, we have looked at how we think about money and where those thoughts came from. This week, we move into something more structural.

We need to talk about the difference between income and wealth, because they are not the same thing, and conflating them is one of the most common and most costly financial errors professionals make.

Let me start with a finding from one of the most influential studies ever conducted on wealth in America.

Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko spent decades studying millionaires, and what they found in their landmark book The Millionaire Next Door upended almost every popular assumption about what wealthy people look like and how they behave. The people with the highest net worth were frequently not the highest earners. They were the people who, over time, spent significantly less than they earned and consistently invested the difference. Meanwhile, many of the highest-income professionals they studied had very little accumulated wealth, because their spending had grown to match, and in many cases exceed, their income.

Source: Stanley, T. J. & Danko, W. D. (1996). The Millionaire Next Door. Longstreet Press.

Stanley and Danko called this the "prodigious accumulator of wealth versus the under-accumulator of wealth" distinction. And the determining factor between the two was not income level. It was the ratio between what came in and what stayed.

The Income Trap

In professional circles, there is a particular version of this trap that is worth naming directly. It is what some researchers have begun calling lifestyle inflation: the tendency for spending to rise in proportion to income, leaving the gap between what is earned and what is accumulated permanently small.

The mechanism is almost invisible in the moment. A raise arrives and a nicer apartment follows. A promotion lands and the car is upgraded. A consulting contract comes in and the holiday becomes international. None of these are wrong choices in isolation. The problem is when they happen consistently and automatically, so that income growth never actually translates into financial security because the lifestyle has always consumed it first.

The Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances, conducted every three years, consistently shows that a significant proportion of high-income households in the United States carry minimal net worth relative to their earnings history. Similar patterns have been documented across economies in the UK, Canada, and across sub-Saharan Africa, where consumer spending among urban professionals has risen sharply even as savings rates have remained low.

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2022). Survey of Consumer Finances.

Net Worth Is the Number That Actually Matters

Income is what comes in during a given period. Wealth is what remains after everything goes out, accumulated over time and invested in assets that hold or grow in value. These are two completely different measurements, and your financial health is far better indicated by the second than the first.

A basic net worth calculation is straightforward. Add up everything you own that has value: savings, investments, property, pension contributions, the surrender value of any insurance policies. Then subtract everything you owe: loans, credit card balances, mortgage outstanding, any other liabilities. What remains is your net worth. It may be a large number. It may be a small one. It may be negative. Whatever it is, it is real, and it is a more honest picture of your financial position than your salary.

Morgan Housel, in The Psychology of Money, makes the observation that wealth is what you do not see. You cannot observe someone's investment portfolio from the outside. What you see is what they spend, and spending is not wealth. It is often the opposite of it.

Source: Housel, M. (2020). The Psychology of Money. Harriman House.

The Practical Question

If you earned every paycheck you have ever received and could add them all up, what percentage of that total do you think you currently have in assets? For most people, this question produces an uncomfortable moment of honest reckoning.

The goal is not guilt. The goal is clarity. Because you cannot address a gap you have not honestly measured. And once you can see it, you can begin making different choices, not dramatic, sweeping changes that last three weeks, but consistent, structural ones that compound quietly over time.

Which brings us to next week: the mechanics of compounding, and why the most powerful financial tool available to most of us is not income, not inheritance, but time.

Further Reading

• Stanley, T. J. & Danko, W. D. (1996). The Millionaire Next Door. Longstreet Press.

• Housel, M. (2020). The Psychology of Money. Harriman House.

• Kiyosaki, R. (1997). Rich Dad Poor Dad. Warner Books. (A useful introduction to the assets vs liabilities framework, though read critically.)

Fiyin

Team Konseye

With The Right Network Anything Is Possible.®